Sara Quran Huzoor Ki Nemat Hai

Book Name:Sara Quran Huzoor Ki Nemat Hai

at the end of the verse, it is stated that they should not feel any discomfort in their hearts regarding his command and must submit to it fully.

(5) From this, it is also known that accepting Islamic commands is obligatory, and rejecting them is disbelief. Furthermore, objecting to them or mocking them is disbelief.[1]

صَلُّوۡا عَلَى الۡحَبِيۡب                                     صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلٰى مُحَمَّد

Allah is pleased with the contentment of Muhammad  صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَاٰلِهٖ وَسَلَّم

Dear Islamic brothers! Here is another incident, a verse, its background, and its tafsīr.

It is written in Tafsīr Ṣirāṭ al-Jinān: When Allah Almighty's Final Prophet Muḥammad    صَلَّی اللہُ تَعَالٰی عَلَیْہِ وَاٰلِہٖ وَسَلَّمَ arrived in Madinah Munawwarah, he was commanded to perform prayers facing Bayt al-Maqdis (Jerusalem). The Beloved Prophet       صَلَّی اللہُ تَعَالٰی عَلَیْہِ وَاٰلِہٖ وَسَلَّمَ  began offering prayers in that direction, in obedience to Allah Almighty's command. However, the pure heart of the Prophet       صَلَّی اللہُ تَعَالٰی عَلَیْہِ وَاٰلِہٖ وَسَلَّمَ  longed for the Kaʿbah to be made the Qibla (direction of prayer) for the Muslims.

One day, while praying, the Prophet       صَلَّی اللہُ تَعَالٰی عَلَیْہِ وَاٰلِہٖ وَسَلَّمَ  repeatedly looked towards the sky, hoping that the command for the change of Qibla would come. It was during that very prayer that this verse was revealed. In it, the pleasure of the Prophet       صَلَّی اللہُ تَعَالٰی عَلَیْہِ وَاٰلِہٖ وَسَلَّمَ  was declared as the pleasure of Allah, and the beauty of his blessed face as he looked to the sky was described in the Quran. Thus, the Kaʿbah was made the Qibla in accordance with the Prophet’s wish. As a result, the Prophet       صَلَّی اللہُ تَعَالٰی عَلَیْہِ وَاٰلِہٖ وَسَلَّمَ  turned towards the Kaʿbah during the prayer, and the Muslims turned with him. Two units of Ẓuhr prayer were performed facing Bayt al-


 

 



[1] Tafsir Ṣirāṭ al-Jinān, vol. 2. pp. 239-240